don't read the menu options and go directly to the page content 
"To put the record straight, the owners of Kent Science Park have no wish to develop homes in the vicinity of the science park"

James Speck

Why we are objecting to the KSP planing applications?

Although the consultation delivered more objections than letters of support, those that do support the application do so on the basis of the jobs that it might one day deliver.

However 60% of those jobs will be created inside the security fence without the need for expansion. Our objection is primarily concerned with the need to expand and the subsequent traffic implications that an expansion might pose whether it be inside or outside of the security fence.

The need for expansion has not been proven, the traffic implications can not be mitigated, so therefore we object.

The documents below contain the full details of our objections to the applications of August and March 2009


August Response Documents


Letter to Swale Borough Council

Response to KSP August application

Response Appendix

Transport Consideration



March Response Documents


Letter to Swale Borough Council March 2009

Response March 2009

Executive Transport Summary March 2009

Transport Appraisal Summary Critique Rev Odyssey March 2009